Wednesday, 16 September 2015

HP to cut up to 30,000 jobs, mostly in services

On verge of splitting into two companies, HP restructures once again

Hewlett-Packard is cutting 25,000 to 30,000 jobs in its enterprise division because of revenue declines. Most of the personnel cuts will be in its enterprise services unit, whose employees often work directly with HP corporate customers.

An HP official, who asked not be named, disputed any notion that customers would be affected by the cutbacks. "We think we are actually improving our ability to serve our customers and partners by focusing on cost," he said. The customer relationship "is the most important relationship that we have and we wouldn’t be doing anything to hurt them."

The cutback is happening as HP is due to split into two firms, when it separates its enterprise division from its PC division as of Nov. 1.

HP is expecting to make some new hires to offset this reduction as it "reshapes" its workforce. How many layoffs or new hires will be in the U.S. is in question.

The action is expected to take $2.7 billion in annual costs out of the business. HP had 302,000 employees as of last October, the end of its previous fiscal year.

There is a risk that some HP customers may not be pleased with the layoffs, especially if longtime, face-to-face relationships are severed, said Charles King, an analyst at Pund-IT.

"Even if you don't end up getting your pink slip, I expect there is going to be a lot of resume polishing at HP over the next few months," said King.

HP has been reporting a steady decline of profits and revenue. In its most recent quarter, HP revenue was down 8% to $25.3 billion.

Meg Whitman, HP's CEO, told analysts that "a big step forward" for HP will be if "enterprise services can stop shrinking."

The goal of the cuts appears to get the enterprise services "flat to down slightly," and from that point it should grow, said Whitman. Demand for services is growing, with services bookings -- "a forward indicator" -- up at 3% she said.

In 2012, HP announced plans to cut its workforce by 55,000, a reduction that has continued to roll out. This brings to 85,000 the number of cuts since Whitman took over in 2011.

HP, as well as other enterprise services providers, has been hit by a shift to public and private cloud services, said King.

HP's services organization took a dramatic leap in size when it acquired EDS in 2008. It added 139,000 employees to HP, but HP soon began cutting its staff. "That acquisition has never really paid off in the way I think HP thought it would," said King.
Best HP Certification Training and HP Exams Training  and more Cisco exams log in to Certkingdom.com

Wednesday, 2 September 2015

13 more big data & analytics companies to watch

So many big data and analytics-focused startups are getting funding these days that I’ve been inspired to compile a second slideshow highlighting these companies. This new batch has reined in some $250 million this year as they seek to help organizations make sense of the seemingly endless pool of data going online.

So many big data and analytics-focused startups are getting funding these days that I’ve been inspired to compile a second slideshow highlighting these companies (see “13 Big Data and Analytics Companies to Watch” for the previous collection). This new batch has reined in some $250 million this year as they seek to help organizations more easily access and make sense of the seemingly endless amount of online data.

Alation
Founded: 2012
Headquarters: Redwood City, Calif.
Funding/investors: $9M in Series A funding led by Costanoa Capital and Data Collective.

Focus: Its data accessibility platform is designed to make information more usable by the masses across enterprises. The company is led by former Oracle, Apple, Google and Microsoft engineers and executives, and its on-premises and virtual private cloud-based offerings promise to help data analysts get in sync, optimize data across Hadoop and other stores, and ensure data governance. Boasts customers including eBay and Square.

Aviso
Founded: 2012
Headquarters: Menlo Park, Calif. (with operations in India, too)
Funding/investors: $15M in Series B funding led by Scale Venture Partners and Next World Capital, bringing total funding to $23M.

Focus: Data science-driven predictive analytics software for sales teams, including the newly released Aviso Insights for Salesforce. Co-founder and CEO K.V. Rao previously founded subscription commerce firm Zuora and worked for WebEx, while Co-founder and CTO Andrew Abrahams was head of quantitative research and model oversight at JPMorgan Chase. The two met about 20 years ago at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications.

Birst
Founded: 2004
Headquarters: San Francisco
Funding/investors: $156M, including a $65M round in March led by Wellington Management.

Focus: Cloud-based business intelligence and analytics that works across compliance-sensitive enterprises but also gives end users self-service data access. This company, formed by a couple of ex-Siebel Analytics team leaders, has now been around for a while, has thousands of customers and has established itself as a competitor to big companies like IBM and Oracle. And it has also partnered with big companies, such as AWS and SAP, whose HANA in-memory database can now run Birst’s software.

BlueData
Founded: 2012
Headquarters: Mountain View
Funding/investors: $39M, including a $20M Series C round led by Intel Capital in August.

Focus: A founding team from VMware has delivered the EPIC software platform designed to enable customers to spin up virtual on-premises Hadoop or Spark clusters that give data scientists easier access to big data and applications. (We also included this firm in our roundup of hot application container startups.)

Datameer
Founded: 2009
Headquarters: San Francisco
Funding/investors: $76M, including $40M in Series E funding led by ST Telemedia.

Focus: Big data analytics application for Hadoop designed to let any employee analyze and visualize structured and unstructured data. Counts British Telecom and Citibank among its customers.

Deep Information Sciences
Founded: 2010
Headquarters: Boston
Funding/investors: $18M, including an $8M Series a round in April led by Sigma Prime Ventures and Stage 1 Ventures.

Focus: The company’s database storage engine employs machine learning and predictive algorithms to enable MySQL databases to handle big data processing needs at enterprise scale. Founded by CTO Thomas Hazel, a database and distributed systems industry veteran.

Looker
Founded: 2012
Headquarters: Santa Cruz
Funding/investors: $48M, including a $30M B round in March led by Meritech

Focus: Web-based business intelligence platform that provides access to data whether in a database or the cloud. A modeling language called LookML enables analysts to create interfaces end users can employ for dashboard or to drill down and really analyze data. Founded by CTO Lloyd Tabb, a one-time principal engineer at Netscape, where he worked on Navigator and Communicator. Looker claims to have Etsy, Uber and Yahoo among its customers.

Maana
Founded: 2012
Headquarters: Palo Alto
Funding: $14M, including $11M in Series A funding in May, with backers including Chevron Technology Ventures and Intel Capital.

Focus: Semantic search engine that plows through big data from multiple sources and delivers information in a way that can be consumed by line-of-business application users. The company announced in June that its platform is now powered by Apache Spark. Co-founder Donald Thompson spent 15 years prior to launching Maana in top engineering and architect jobs at Microsoft, including on the Bing search project.

RapidMiner
Founded: 2007
Headquarters: Cambridge, Mass.
Funding/investors: $20M, including $15M in Series B funding led by Ascent Venture Partners.

Focus: This company, which got its start in Germany under founder Ingo Mierswa, offers an open source-based predictive analytics platform for business analysts and data scientists. The platform, available on-premises or in the cloud, has been upgraded of late with new security and workflow capabilities. Peter Lee, a former EVP at Tibco, took over as CEO in June.

Reltio
Founded: 2011
Headquarters: Redwood Shores, Calif.
Funding/investors: $10M in Series A funding in March, from Crosslink Capital and .406 Ventures.

Focus: The team behind Informatica/Siperian MDM started Reltio, which offers what it calls data-driven applications for sales, marketing, compliance and other users, as well as a cloud-based master data management platform. The company claims its offerings break down silos between applications like CRM and ERP to give business users direct access to and control over data.

Sensai
Founded: 2014
Headquarters: Palo Alto
Funding/investors: $900K in seed funding from investors including Andreessen Horowitz and Formation8.

Focus: A “data science platform for the unstructured world.” Sensai’s offering makes it possible to quantify and analyze textual information, such as from news articles and regulatory filings. The company is focused initially on big financial firms, like UBS, though also has tech giant Siemens among its earlier customers. Two of Sensai’s co-founders come from crowdfunding company Rally.org.

spare5

Founded: 2014
Headquarters: Seattle
Funding/investors: $13.25M, including a $10M Series A round led by Foundry Group, New Enterprise Associates and Madrona Venture Group

Focus: This iPhone app enables businesses to tap into smartphone users (or “Fives”) to clean up big data in their spare time for a little spare cash. The idea is that computing power alone can’t be counted on to crunch and analyze big data. Micro-tasks include everything from SEO-focused photo tagging to conducting surveys.

Treasure Data
Founded: 2011
Headquarters: Mountain View
Funding/investors: $23M, including $15M in January in Series B funding led by Scale Venture Partners.

Focus: Provides cloud services designed to simplify the collection, storage and analysis of data, whether from mobile apps, Internet of Things devices, cloud applications or other sources of information. This alternative to Hadoop platforms and services handles some 22 trillion events per year, according to the company, which has a presence not just in Silicon Valley, but in Japan and South Korea as well.

Best Microsoft MCTS Certification, Microsoft MCITP Training at certkingdom.com

Thursday, 20 August 2015

The real dirt on programming certifications

Spotlight may be on Amazon, but tech jobs are high profit and high stress

It's true. People working in Silicon Valley may cry at their desks, may be expected to respond to emails in the middle of the night and be in the office when they'd rather be sick in bed.

But that's the price employees pay to work for some of the most successful and innovative tech companies in the world, according to industry analysts.

"It's a pressure cooker for tech workers," said Bill Reynolds, research director for Foote Partners LLC, an IT workforce research firm. "But for every disgruntled employee, someone will tell you it's fine. This is the ticket to working in this area and they're willing to pay it."

The tech industry has been like this for years, he added.
Employees are either Type A personalities who thrive on the pressure, would rather focus on a project than get a full night's sleep and don't mind pushing or being pushed.

If that's not who they are, they should get another job and probably in another industry.

"A lot of tech companies failed, and the ones that made it, made it based on a driven culture. No one made it working 9 to 5," said John Challenger, CEO of Challenger, Gray & Christmas, an executive outplacement firm. "Silicon Valley has been the vanguard of this type of work culture. It can get out of control. It can be too much and people can burn out. But it's who these companies are."

Work culture at tech companies, specifically at Amazon, hit the spotlight earlier this week when the New York Times ran a story on the online retailer and what it called its "bruising workplace."

The story talked about employees crying at their desks, working 80-plus-hour weeks and being expected to work when they're not well or after a family tragedy.

"At Amazon, workers are encouraged to tear apart one another's ideas in meetings, toil long and late (emails arrive past midnight, followed by text messages asking why they were not answered), and held to standards that the company boasts are "unreasonably high," the article noted.

In response, Amazon.com CEO Jeff Bezos sent a memo to employees saying he didn't recognize the company described in the Times article.

"The article doesn't describe the Amazon I know or the caring Amazonians I work with every day," Bezos wrote. "More broadly, I don't think any company adopting the approach portrayed could survive, much less thrive, in today's highly competitive tech hiring market."

Bezos hasn't been the only one at Amazon to respond. Nick Ciubotariu, head of Infrastructure development at Amazon.com, wrote a piece on LinkedIn, taking on the Times article.

"During my 18 months at Amazon, I've never worked a single weekend when I didn't want to. No one tells me to work nights," he wrote. "We work hard, and have fun. We have Nerf wars, almost daily, that often get a bit out of hand. We go out after work. We have 'Fun Fridays.' We banter, argue, play video games and Foosball. And we're vocal about our employee happiness."

Amazon has high expectations of its workers because it's one of the largest and most successful companies in the world, according to industry analysts.

The company, which started as an online book store, now sells everything from cosmetics to bicycles and toasters. With a valuation of $250 billion, Amazon even surpassed mega retailer Walmart this summer as the biggest retailer in the U.S.

With that kind of success comes a lot of pressure to stay on top and to come up with new, innovative ways to keep customers happy.

That kind of challenge can lead to a stressful workplace where employees are called on to work long hours and to outwork competitors' own employees.

It's just the way of the beast, according to Victor Janulaitis, CEO of Janco Associates Inc., a management consulting firm.

"If you go to work for a high-powered company where you have a chance of being a millionaire in a few years, you are going to work 70 to 80 hours a week," he said. "You are going to have to be right all the time and you are going to be under a lot of stress. Your regular Joe is really going to struggle there."

This kind of work stress isn't relegated to Amazon alone. Far from it, Janulaitis said.

"I think it's fairly widespread in any tech company that is successful," he noted. "It's just a very stressful environment. You're dealing with a lot of money and a lot of Type A personalities who want to get things done. If you're not a certain type of person, you're not going to make it. It's much like the Wild West. They have their own rules."

Of course, tech companies, whether Amazon, Google, Apple or Facebook, are known to work people hard, going back to the days when IBM was launching its first PCs and Microsoft was making its Office software ubiquitous around the world.

However, tech companies also are known for giving their employees perks that people working in other industries only dream of.

Google, for instance, has world-class chefs cooking free food for its employees, while also setting up nap pods, meditation classes and sandy volleyball courts.

Netflix recently made global headlines for offering mothers and fathers unlimited time off for up to a year after the birth or adoption of a child.

It's the yin and yang of Silicon Valley, said Megan Slabinski, district president of Robert Half Technology, a human resources consulting firm.

"All those perks - the ping pong tables, the free snacks, the free day care -- that started in the tech industry come with the job because the job is so demanding," she said. "There's a level of demand in the tech industry that translates to the work environment."

When asked if Amazon is any harder on its employees than other major tech companies, Slabinski laughed.

"Amazon isn't different culturally from other IT companies," she said. "I've been doing this for 16 years. You see the good, the bad and the ugly. If you are working for tech companies, the expectation is you are going to work really hard. This is bleeding-edge technology, and the trade-off is there's less work-life balance. The people who thrive in this industry, thrive on being on the bleeding edge. If you can't take it, you go into another industry."

Janulaitis noted that top-tier employees are always chased by other companies, but middle-tier workers - those who are doing a good job but might not be the brightest stars of the workforce - are hunkering down and staying put.

Fears of a still jittery job market have convinced a lot of people to keep their heads down, put up with whatever their managers ask of them and continue to be able to pay their mortgages, especially if they live in pricey Silicon Valley.

That, said Janulaitis, makes companies more apt to ask even more from their employees, who know they're likely stuck where they are for now.

"Once the job market changes, turnover will increase significantly in the IT field," he said.

Like stock traders working under extreme pressure on Wall Street or medical interns working 36-hour shifts, the tech industry is a high-stress environment - one that's not suited to every worker.

"If you can't live with that pressure, you should go somewhere else," said Reynolds. "For people in Silicon Valley, it's who they are. It's the kind of person they are."

Best Microsoft MCTS Certification, Microsoft MCITP Training at certkingdom.com

Saturday, 15 August 2015

Microsoft's rollout of Windows 10 gets B+ grade

General vibe of the new OS remains positive, say analysts

Microsoft has done a good job rolling out Windows 10 in the first two weeks, analysts said today, and the general vibe for Windows 8's replacement has been positive, even though glitches have dampened some enthusiasm.

"If I had to give Microsoft a letter grade, it would be a B or a B+," said Steve Kleynhans of Gartner. "It's not an A because it hasn't gone perfectly. They've stubbed their toe over privacy issues, for example."

Microsoft began serving up the free Windows 10 upgrade late on July 28, giving participants in the firm's Insider preview program first shot at the production code. It then slowly began triggering upgrade notices on Windows 7 and 8.1 machines whose owners had earlier "reserved" copies through an on-device app planted on their devices this spring.

The Redmond, Wash. company has said little of the rollout's performance other than to tout that 14 million systems were running Windows 10 within 24 hours of its debut.

Estimates based on user share data from U.S. analytics company Net Applications, however, suggests that by Aug. 8, some 45 million PCs were powered by Windows 10.

Analysts largely applauded the launch. "As far as the roll-out, it's not any worse than any other Windows," said Kleynhans. "But it's all happening at this compressed timetable.

"And social media now amplifies any problems," he continued, much more so than three years ago when Windows 8 released, much less in 2009, when Microsoft last had a hit on its hands.

Others were more bullish on Microsoft's performance. "Windows 10's go-to-market was really quite good," said Wes Miller of Directions on Microsoft, a research firm that specializes in tracking the company's moves.

Miller was especially impressed with Microsoft's ability to make customers covet the upgrade. "Something Microsoft has not always done a great job of is creating a sense of exclusivity," said Miller. "But they're withholding [the upgrade] just enough that there's a sense of excitement. People are saying, 'I want it, I'm not getting the upgrade yet.' Arguably, that exactly what Microsoft wants."

Windows 10's rollout has departed from those of past editions in significant ways.
Historically, Microsoft released a new Windows to its OEM (original equipment manufacturer) partners first, who were given months to prepare new devices pre-loaded with the operating system. Only when the computer makers were ready did Microsoft deliver paid upgrades to customers who wanted to refresh their current hardware. Relatively few users paid for the upgrades; most preferred to purchase a new PC with the new OS already installed.

This cycle, Microsoft gave away the Windows 10 upgrade to hundreds of millions of customers -- those running a Home or Pro/Professional edition of Windows 7 or Windows 8.1 -- to jumpstart the new OS's adoption. With some exceptions, the upgrade hit before OEMs had prepared new devices or seeded them to retail.

Because of the large number of customers eligible for the free upgrade, Microsoft announced it would distribute the code in several waves that would take weeks (according to Microsoft) or months (the consensus of analysts) to complete. While some had predicted that the upgrade's massive audience would stress the delivery system Microsoft had built, or even affect the Internet at large, neither happened.

The "Get Windows 10" app -- which was silently placed on PCs beginning in March -- not only served as a way to queue customers for the upgrade, but also ran compatibility checks to ensure the hardware and software would support the new operating system, another slick move by Microsoft.

"Microsoft rolled out Windows 10 to the audience that would be most receptive," said Patrick Moorhead, principal analyst at Moor Insights & Strategy, referring to the Insiders-get-it-first tactic. "Then they rolled it out to those who weren't Insiders, but who had expressed a desire to get the upgrade. And only those [whose devices] passed all of its tests got it. That was a smart thing to do."

The latter was designed to limit upgrade snafus, something Microsoft has chiefly, although not entirely, accomplished. "While the rollout was pretty clean, there have been glitchy issues here and there," said Kleynhans, who cited post-Windows-10-upgrade updates that crippled some consumers' machines.

Moorhead echoed that, highlighting the out-the-gate problem many had keeping Nvidia's graphic drivers up-to-date as Microsoft's and Nvidia's update services tussled over which got to install a driver. "Problems have been more anecdotal than system-wide," Moorhead said. "And they seem to get remedied very quickly."

The bungles haven't been widespread enough to taint the generally favorable impression of Windows 10 generated by social media, news reports and Microsoft's PR machine, the analysts argued.

"Overall, I'd say Windows 10 has received a much more positive reception than other [editions of] Windows," said Moorhead, who said the reaction was justified, since the developing consensus is that Windows 10 is a big improvement over its flop-of-a-predecessor, Windows 8.

"The vibe is positive, but it's much more about consumers now than businesses," said Directions' Miller. Enterprises, he said, will take a wait-and-see approach -- as they always do -- before jumping onto Windows 10, as they must if they're to stick with Microsoft, a given since there isn't a viable alternative.

A credible reaction from corporate customers, Miller continued, won't be visible until Microsoft finishes unveiling its update tracks, called "branches," particularly the "Long-term servicing branch" (LTSB). That branch will mimic the traditional servicing model where new features and functionality will be blocked from reaching systems that businesses don't want to see constantly changing.

"People are liking what they are getting out of the other end" of the upgrade, added Kleynhans. "From what I've heard, they're happy, surprisingly happy, and generally pretty positive about the OS. But I'd expect the new shine to wear off after the first couple of weeks."

Best Microsoft MCTS Certification, Microsoft MCITP Training at certkingdom.com



Tuesday, 4 August 2015

Yahoo tackles big 'malvertising' campaign in its ad network

Ads with malicious code may have appeared across Yahoo's sites

Yahoo said Monday it had removed malware from its advertising network, after malicious code there had gone undetected for at least six days.

Security researchers at Malwarebytes said they discovered malicious ads planted in Yahoo's network on Sunday and alerted Yahoo. The malware attack had been underway since last Tuesday, wrote Jerome Segura, a senior security researcher at Malwarebytes Labs.

The malware was found in Yahoo's ads network at ads.yahoo.com, which runs ads across Yahoo's sites like its finance, games and news portals, as well as Yahoo.com. Users may have come across the infected ads when visiting Yahoo's sites.

A Yahoo spokeswoman declined to say how many advertisers were affected.
The attack used a method known as malvertising, in which attackers dupe online publishers into running malicious ads. They look like any other ads and may not require any interaction from users to infect their machines. If a visitor comes across a malicious ad, it can cause their browser to redirect to another site that attacks their computer.

In Yahoo's case, Malwarebytes detected ransomware, which encrypts files on users' computers unless they pay money to the attackers. The malware had also targeted sites hosted by Microsoft's Azure cloud platform, Malwarebytes said.

It's not the first time Yahoo's system has been hit with malvertising. Last year, an aggressive campaign was discovered that affected visitors across Yahoo and AOL's sites.

Malvertising might be becoming more prevalent in general. Last week, security company Cyphort said 10 million people may have visited websites carrying malicious ads in the last 10 days alone.

Experts advise users to keep their operating systems, browsers and browser plug-ins up to date to avoid becoming infected by malvertising. Yahoo visitors can also run a scan with their antivirus or anti-malware software, Malwarebytes said.

Best Microsoft MCTS Certification, Microsoft MCITP Training at certkingdom.com

Sunday, 26 July 2015

The cloud is complex, so Intel's launched a sweeping project to fix it

The first step is a project with Rackspace to make OpenStack easier to deploy and manage

Intel has kicked off a broad effort to speed the adoption of the modern cloud infrastructure, which it says has been slow to take off because the software is complex and takes too long to deploy.

"Most people look at the market and say 'The cloud is on fire'," Jason Waxman, head of Intel's cloud infrastructure group, told reporters Thursday. "We're in a position to say, 'You know what? It's not moving fast enough.'"

To speed its growth, Intel has kicked off a multi-pronged effort, called the Cloud for All initiative, that includes hiring hundreds of additional engineers to work on open-source cloud software, setting up two massive compute clusters where companies can test and validate applications, and making further investments and acquisitions itself.

Its first move is a partnership with Rackspace to make the popular OpenStack cloud platform enterprise-ready and easier to use. Intel and Rackspace will hire hundreds of engineers at a development center near San Antonio, Texas, to work on OpenStack components such as its scheduling software, network capabilities and container services.

The goal is not to create "yet another OpenStack distribution," Waxman said, but to improve "the overall health of the project." The companies will also make OpenStack easier to scale.

"Today at best, the most successful OpenStack deployments scale to a few hundred nodes," he said. "Our goal is to enable enterprise class features at scale for thousands of nodes,"

Within six months, Rackspace and Intel will provide developers with free access to two 1,000-node compute clusters where they can test their applications, and Rackspace will offer training programs around the software. Intel picked Rackspace to work with because it's an original developer of OpenStack and runs one of the largest OpenStack public clouds.

The cloud is a fuzzy term but Intel is referring generally to an architecture in which applications are virtualized, or running in software containers, and can be set up and pulled down with high levels of automation.

The architecture is said to help IT departments cut costs and respond to business needs more quickly. But while large companies like Amazon and Google have turned it into a science, most businesses are struggling to get there.

The problem, as Intel sees it, is that choosing and deploying the software to build a cloud is too complex for most companies to handle. There's an abundance of hypervisors, orchestration software and developer environments, and within those options there are further configuration choices to be made.

"That makes it hard to build a fully functional, reliable cloud stack. It takes a lot of expertise," said Diane Bryant, the senior vice president in charge of Intel's data center group.

Deployments take months to complete and customers end up with systems that are "like snowflakes," she said -- "unique and a bit fragile."

The work with Rackspace is only the first step in the Cloud for All initiative, in which Intel will work with other partners to simplify and build out components for a "software defined infrastructure."

Intel's goal is to enable "tens of thousands" of new public and private clouds to be built, and to enable a typical enterprise to build a "full functioning, self service cloud portal" in a single day, Bryant said.

The initiative also includes further investments by Intel, and work with standards bodies and other stakeholders. Intel isn't talking about those other investments and partnerships today, but Bryant said to expect "20 major announcements" from Intel over the coming year.

.Comptia A+ Training, Comptia A+ certification

Thursday, 9 July 2015

Best office apps for Android, round 3

Microsoft's Office apps are finally available for Android smartphones and tablets. Here’s how they stack up against past favorites

Getting serious about mobile productivity
We live in an increasingly mobile world -- and while many of us spend our days working on traditional desktops or laptops, we also frequently find ourselves on the road and relying on tablets or smartphones to stay connected and get work done.

So where do you turn when it's time for serious productivity on an Android device? The Google Play Store boasts several popular office suite options; at a glance, they all look fairly comparable. But don't be fooled: All Android office apps are not created equal.

I've spent many hours testing and revisiting the six most noteworthy Android office suites -- DataViz's Docs to Go; Google's Docs, Sheets, and Slides; Infraware's Polaris Office; Kingsoft's WPS Mobile Office; MobiSystems' OfficeSuite 8; and Microsoft's Word, Excel, and PowerPoint, which finally became available for both phones and tablets in June -- to see where they shine and where they fall short. I looked at how each suite handles word processing, spreadsheet editing, and presentation editing -- both in terms of the features offered and regarding user interface and experience. I took both tablet and smartphone performance into consideration.

Click through for a detailed analysis; by the time you're done, you'll have a crystal-clear idea of which Android office suite is right for you.

Best Android word processor: OfficeSuite 8 Premium
MobiSystems' OfficeSuite 8 offers a desktop-class word processing experience that no competitor -- even with Microsoft in the fray -- can match. The UI is clean, easy to use, and intelligently designed to expand to a tablet-optimized setup. Its robust set of editing tools is organized into easily accessible on-screen tabs on a tablet (and condensed into drop-down menus on a phone). OfficeSuite 8 provides practically everything you need, from basic formatting to advanced table creation and manipulation utilities. You can insert images, shapes, and freehand drawings; add and view comments; track, accept, and reject changes; spell-check; and calculate word counts. There's even a native PDF markup utility, PDF export, and the ability to print to a cloud-connected printer.

OfficeSuite 8 works with locally stored Word-formatted files and connects directly to a wide range of cloud storage services -- Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, SugarSync, OneDrive, and Amazon Cloud Drive -- enabling you to view and edit documents without having to download or manually sync your work.

The only real downside to OfficeSuite 8 is its pricing model and convoluted sales approach. Search the Play Store, and you'll find three separate offerings from MobiSystems: a free app, OfficeSuite 8 + PDF Converter; a $14.99 app, OfficeSuite 8 Pro + PDF; and another free app, OfficeSuite 8 Pro (Trial). The company also sells a dizzying array of add-ons that range in price from free to $30.

But wait -- it gets even more complex: The top-of-the-line OfficeSuite 8 version reviewed here is accessible only by downloading the free OfficeSuite 8 + PDF Converter app, then following the link on the app's main screen to upgrade to the Premium level. That gives you the most fully featured setup available -- but it now requires an ongoing $19.99 yearly subscription to maintain (a change from when we last reviewed the product earlier this year). Regardless of the app's quality, a recurring cost may be a tough pill to swallow -- especially if you don't have an expense account to lean on.

The best choice without a recurring fee is the $14.99 OfficeSuite 8 Pro version. That app is identical to the Premium app in UI and provides most of the same core features, with two noteworthy exceptions: a robust spell-check function (the Pro version's editor will identify misspelled words inline but not offer suggestions) and support for a full range of standard fonts. (The Premium app does have a few other additional features, like an integrated photo editor, PDF scanner, and custom predictive keyboard, but those elements aren't related to the core office experience and can easily be found in other third-party apps.)

To add those two noted omissions to the Pro version -- you'll probably want to get the fonts, at the least -- you'll need to pay $9.99 apiece for MobiSystems' QuickSpell and Font Pack add-ons, which integrate with the app and fill the respective voids. Adding both elements to the Pro version would bring your grand total to a one-time payment of $34.97 -- which, while not inexpensive, may be a better value than the Premium app's $20 annual recurring fee for most users. Adding even one of those two extra elements would bring the total to $24.98, which is reasonable for what Pro offers.

App: OfficeSuite 8 Premium
Price: $19.99 per year (via in-app upgrade)
Developer: MobiSystems

Runner-up Android word processor: Microsoft Word
Microsoft's Word app for Android is full of functionality but at times lacks finesse. On the tablet front, Word provides an interface that'll be familiar to anyone who's used Microsoft's office suite on other platforms -- and while it isn't quite as intuitive or native-feeling to Android as OfficeSuite 8, it's easy enough to figure out. (Some of the more problematic UI issues I identified in my initial review of the app have been rectified with recent updates.)

On the phone front, however, Microsoft falters. In its attempt to scale the app to a smaller screen, Microsoft has created a UI that's clumsy and awkward in real-world use. Most commands are hidden behind a single editing icon at the top of the screen; tapping that icon brings up a bizarre bottom-of-screen panel that takes up half the interface, thus leaving you with little room to see your actual document. You also can't use your on-screen keyboard while the editing panel is open, which is plain strange.

Interface aside, Word lacks advanced features that are present in other word processors, like real-time collaboration (which, curiously, is a core feature of Microsoft's main Office 365 product) along with automatic saving, the ability to handle PDFs and other alternate file formats, and password protection -- and it requires an ongoing monthly subscription if you want access to certain basic features like inserting page breaks or tracking and reviewing changes. Microsoft's app is also limited in its cloud connectivity options, with OneDrive and Dropbox as the only choices available.

For many users, though, the familiarity of Microsoft's software will serve as a strong advantage -- and those who already subscribe to Office 365 in particular may be won over by the relatively consistent experience across platforms. Even with its drawbacks and limitations, Word for Android is a contender worth considering.

App: Microsoft Word
Price: Free
Developer: Microsoft

The rest of the Android word processors
Google's free Google Docs is a usable tool for folks with basic editing needs, especially those already invested in the Google ecosystem. While nowhere near as fully featured as other word processors, Docs excels at cross-device synchronization and multiuser collaboration: The app syncs changes instantly and automatically as you work. As such, you can access a document simultaneously from your phone, tablet, or computer, and the edits and additions show up in real-time on all devices. You can also invite other users into the real-time editing process and keep in contact with them via in-document commenting.

Infraware's Polaris Office is a decent word processor held back by pesky UI quirks and an absurdly overpriced full-feature upgrade option. The app's editor was clearly created for smartphones; as a result, it delivers a subpar tablet experience with basic commands tucked away and features stuffed into short windows that sometimes require awkward scrolling to see all the content. Polaris also requires you to create an account before using the app and pushes its $40-a-year membership fee to gain access to certain features -- including PDF exporting, full cloud connectivity support, and the company's own superfluous cloud storage service.

Kingsoft's free WPS Mobile Office (formerly Kingsoft Office) has a decent UI but can be slow to open files. I also found it somewhat buggy and inconsistent: When attempting to edit existing Word documents in WPS, for instance, it typically takes several seconds for the virtual keyboard to appear -- which I haven't experienced with any other app. (I experienced this on multiple devices with WPS, so it wasn’t specific to any one phone or tablet.)

DataViz's Docs to Go (formerly Documents to Go) has a dated, inefficient UI, with basic commands buried behind layers of pop-up menus and a design reminiscent of Android's 2010 Gingerbread era. While it offers a reasonable set of features, it lacks functionality like image insertion and spell check; also, it's difficult to find and open locally stored documents. In addition, it requires a $14.99 Premium Key to remove ads peppered throughout the program and to gain access to any cloud storage capabilities.

Best Android spreadsheet editor: OfficeSuite 8 Premium
With its outstanding user interface and comprehensive range of features, OfficeSuite 8 stands out above the rest in the realm of spreadsheets. Like its word processor, MobiSystems’ spreadsheet editor is clean, easy to use, and fully adaptive to the tablet form.

It's fully featured, too, with all the mathematical functions you'd expect organized into intuitive categories and easily accessible via a prominent dedicated on-screen button. Other commands are broken down into standard top-of-screen tabs on a tablet or are condensed into a drop-down menu on a smartphone.

From advanced formatting options to multiple-sheet support, wireless printing, and PDF exporting, there's little lacking in this well-rounded setup. As mentioned above, OfficeSuite offers a large list of cloud storage options to which you can connect to keep your work synced across multiple devices.

App: OfficeSuite 8 Premium
Price: $19.99 per year (via in-app upgrade)
Developer: Mobile Systems

Runner-up Android spreadsheet editor: Microsoft Excel
Microsoft's Excel has a respectable set of features and is quite commendable on the tablet side of things. The interface follows Microsoft's typical Excel design and should require little to no learning curve for anyone accustomed to that software.

On a smartphone, however, Excel suffers from the same UI flaws as the company's word processing application. Using the app on a smaller device is passable but not a great experience.

While the core spreadsheet functions are plentiful, as with Word, broader office suite features like real-time collaboration, save-to-PDF support, and password protection are missing in Microsoft's mobile offering -- and no notable features are added to Excel with a paid Office 365 subscription.

Again, it's all relative. Excel's impressive spreadsheet functionality and familiar presentation -- not to mention its free nature -- make for an appealing combination. However, be sure you're OK with the aforementioned drawbacks compared to the higher-ranked OfficeSuite application.

App: Microsoft Excel
Price: Free
Developer: Microsoft

The rest of the Android spreadsheet editors
Google Sheets is fine for basic viewing or tweaking of a simple spreadsheet but is quite limited in functionality compared to other contenders. You can enter and manipulate data and perform standard spreadsheet functions, but the app lacks tools for more advanced tasks like sorting cells, freezing cells, and inserting images or charts. Its saving grace is the integrated cloud syncing and multiuser/multidevice collaboration that Google does so well.

Polaris Office still suffers from a subpar, non-tablet-optimized UI -- and with the spreadsheet editor specifically, touch targets are bewilderingly small, which is frustrating for a device that's controlled by fingers. The app offers an admirable set of features, though, even if the options aren't ideally presented or easily accessible.

WPS Mobile Office is OK but unexceptional: It's sometimes slow to open files, and its Function command -- a vital component of spreadsheet work -- is hidden in the middle of an Insert menu. On the plus side, it has an impressive range of features and doesn't seem to suffer from the keyboard bug present in its word-processing counterpart.

Docs to Go is barely in the race. Its embarrassingly dated UI makes no attempt to take advantage of the tablet form: Every command is buried behind multiple layers of pop-up menus, all of which are accessible only via an awkward hamburger icon at the top right of the screen. The app's Function command doesn't even offer descriptions of what the options do -- only Excel-style lingo like ABS, ACOS, and COUNTIF. And during my testing, the app failed to open some perfectly valid Excel (.xlsx) files I used across all the programs as samples.

Best Android presentation editor: OfficeSuite 8 Premium
OfficeSuite 8’s intuitive, tablet-optimized UI makes it easy to edit and create presentations on the go. Yet again, it's the best-in-class contender for most users. (Are you starting to sense a pattern here?)

OfficeSuite offers loads of options for making slides look professional, including a variety of templates and a huge selection of slick transitions. It has tools for inserting images, text boxes, shapes, and freehand drawings into your slides, and it supports presenter notes and offers utilities for quickly duplicating or reordering slides. You can export to PDF and print to a cloud-connected printer easily.

If you're serious about mobile presentation editing, OfficeSuite 8 is the most well-rounded option available.

App: OfficeSuite 8 Premium
Price: $19.99 per year (via in-app upgrade)
Developer: Mobile Systems

Runner-up Android presentation editor: Microsoft PowerPoint
Microsoft's PowerPoint provides a strong set of tools for creating and editing presentations on the go, including an impressive array of templates, themes, and transitions. While it lacks a few bells and whistles present in OfficeSuite's editor -- like the ability to insert a freehand drawing into a slide -- it has no shortage of options for creating polished presentations.

Like Microsoft's other apps, however, PowerPoint for Android is missing basic office suite features such as password protection, the ability to export to PDF, and the option to sync with any cloud providers beyond Microsoft OneDrive and Dropbox. Its phone interface could also be better.

Still, PowerPoint is pretty good, all in all -- and it should be more than capable of handling the mobile editing needs of most users. It's a small step below our top pick in both feature availability and overall user experience.

App: Microsoft PowerPoint
Price: Free
Developer: Microsoft

The rest of the Android presentation editors
Google Slides is bare-bones: You can do basic text editing and formatting, and that's about it. The app offers predefined arrangements for text box placement -- and includes the ability to view and edit presenter notes -- but with no way to insert images or slide backgrounds and no rich templates or transitions, it's impossible to create a presentation that looks like it came from this decade.

Polaris Office has a decent set of features, including a small set of basic templates to help you get started. They're far less polished and professional-looking than OfficeSuite's or PowerPoint's, but they're at least something. Polaris offers no way to duplicate an existing slide, however, nor does it sport any transitions to give your presentation pizzazz.

WPS Mobile Office is quite basic, though with a few flourishes: The app allows you to insert images, shapes, tables, and charts in addition to plain ol' text. Like Google Slides, it lacks templates, transitions, and any other advanced tools, and the results won't look polished or professional.

Last and again least, Docs to Go -- as you're probably expecting by this point -- borders on unusable. The app's UI is dated and clunky, and the editor offers practically no tools for modern presentation creation. You can't insert images or transitions; even basic formatting tools are sparse. Don't waste your time looking at this app.

InfoWorld scorecard: Office apps for Android

The results are clear: OfficeSuite 8 is by far the best overall office suite on Android today. From its excellent UI to its commendable feature set, the app is in a league of its own. Of course, it comes at a cost: At $19.99 per year, the full Premium version isn't cheap, but you get what you pay for -- in this case, the best mobile office experience with next to no compromises. For those who prefer a one-time payment rather than an ongoing subscription (who doesn't?), the OfficeSuite 8 Pro version ($14.99) provides the same core experience, though you'll have to purchase separate $9.99 add-ons in order to get an enhanced spell-check function and full font support (the latter, at the very least, most people will want).

Microsoft's new Office apps are a distant second in overall quality, but they're still quite good and worth considering -- particularly given OfficeSuite's elevated cost, and particularly for someone who is committed to Microsoft's software and/or already a paid Office 365 subscriber. Even without a paid subscription, the Android versions of Word, Excel, and PowerPoint are perfectly decent options for users who want respectable free apps for mobile productivity and aren't worried about having the absolute best user experience or most complete set of features.

If basic on-the-go word processing is all you require, meanwhile -- and you work primarily with Google services -- Google's free Docs app may be a viable choice. The company's spreadsheet and presentation editors are less functional, but depending on your needs, they might suffice. And the full suite's cross-device synchronization and multiuser collaboration are very compelling benefits of going the Google route -- again, as long as your feature requirements are minimal.

Polaris Office is adequate but unremarkable. OfficeSuite and Microsoft's Office apps are more powerful and pleasant to use, while Google's productivity tools have the clear cloud-centric advantages. Polaris fails to stand out for any particular strength, which makes it difficult to recommend enthusiastically among the more outstanding alternatives.

WPS Mobile Office is a small but significant step behind that, meanwhile, while Docs to Go is far too flawed to be taken seriously as an option.

With that, you're officially armed with all the necessary knowledge to make your decision. Grab the mobile office suite that best suits your needs -- and be productive wherever you may go.

Best Microsoft MCTS Certification, Microsoft MCITP Training at certkingdom.com